| Recent Featured Videos and Articles | Eastern “Orthodoxy” Refuted | How To Avoid Sin | The Antichrist Identified! | What Fake Christians Get Wrong About Ephesians | Why So Many Can't Believe | “Magicians” Prove A Spiritual World Exists | Amazing Evidence For God | News Links |
| Vatican II “Catholic” Church Exposed | Steps To Convert | Outside The Church There Is No Salvation | E-Exchanges | The Holy Rosary | Padre Pio | Traditional Catholic Issues And Groups | Help Save Souls: Donate |  |
This section of our website (which is updated daily) contains some less formal – and short – e-mail exchanges that we’ve had which we feel may be of value to our readers. We will include those portions of the exchanges we deem relevant and valuable. We often add bolding and underlining which are not necessarily that of the other party. This section also frequently includes, not only e-exchanges we have, but also our notes, updates and comments. Section containing some important recent posts.
New Video Posted
Francis Denies Christianity! – Endorses “All Religions”
Foolishness To Defend Francis
Francis Denies Christianity! – Endorses “All Religions”
It takes a damning level of foolishness to defend these heresies of Francis.
JR
Leo the Great – Powerful On Baptism
No Baptism, No Salvation – Pope St. Leo The Great
Powerful video. God is all just. As no one entered Heaven except until Jesus' atonement, likewise no one should presume to say that anyone can be saved except as Jesus has said -- and Jesus said belief and water baptism are required (Mark 16:16). Those who entertain belief in 'baptism of desire' should recognize more so the prevalent 'apostasy of desire' of our day. While many are called, few are chosen. And of those 'chosen,' Jesus said that when he comes again, "...shall he find, think you, faith on earth?" (Luke 18"8).
J. Balderston
Blind Guides On The New Mass
The New Mass Lacks The “Mystery Of Faith” (Novus Ordo Modernists Refuted)
Your comment at 11:42 regarding blind guides and how these heretics are being guided by them to hell was masterfully delivered. I really appreciate that amount of effort you not only put into your scripts, but the visuals, especially your thumbnails. Your content really captivates!
Dan
Good Thief & Baptism – Irrefutable Facts
Jesus’ Descent Into Hell & The Baptism Of The Good Thief
The information in this video are irrefutable facts. People must bookmark this and give this video to all people who will question about that good thief argument, etc.
Glenn Raya
Below is a passage (translated from Latin) from pre-Vatican II theologian Fr. Christian Pesch, S.J. (1835-1925) on the issue of whether St. Thomas Aquinas contradicted the doctrine of the Immaculate Conception. Fr. Pesch correctly acknowledged that St. Thomas contradicted the Immaculate Conception in the sense in which it was later defined by the Church. Pesch even calls it “desperate” to claim that St. Thomas was not wrong on this point. This issue is relevant to properly understanding the Magisterium. It reinforces the point that the teaching of saints and theologians (including a great saint such as St. Thomas) is not equivalent to the teaching of the Magisterium or the Chair of St. Peter. Here’s what Pesch wrote in a work published in 1908:
Fr. Christian Pesch (1835-1925), S. J., De Deo Creante (ed. 3., 1908), tract. 1. sect. 4, a. 4, prop. 33, #s 327 et 339 et 186: “In the school of the Dominicans Blessed Albert the Great taught that it was of the faith that the Blessed Virgin, following her contraction of original sin, was sanctified in the womb before her birth (III. Sent. Dist. 3. A. 4); but concerning the day or the hour no one knows except through revelation; except that it is more probable to expect that grace would be conferred shortly after animation rather than long after. But whether in this matter St. Thomas followed his teacher is still a disputed question… Nevertheless, I think that I should say it seems to me certain that St. Thomas denied the Immaculate Conception in that sense in which it was later defined by the Church… It cannot be denied – according to the position that St Thomas often propounds in his discourses when specifically treating of this topic – that the Blessed Virgin, in the first instant of the infusion of her soul, actually contracted Original Sin; but that shortly afterwards she was sanctified by grace.”
“The passage [of St. Thomas] is in itself so clear that the exegetical attempt to remove from this passage the acknowledgment of Original Sin in the Blessed Virgin is a desperate act!”
We have a video that discusses St. Thomas’ writing on this matter. It shows that St. Thomas was wrong on the issue: https://vaticancatholic.com/immaculate-conception-st-thomas-aquinas/ For example, St. Thomas wrote:
St. Thomas Aquinas, Summa Theologiae Pt. III, Q. 27, A. 2, Reply to Objection 2: “If the soul of the Blessed Virgin had never incurred the stain of original sin, this would be derogatory to the dignity of Christ, by reason of His being the universal Savior of all.”
St. Thomas’ statement was obviously incorrect, as it contradicts the dogma of the Immaculate Conception as it would be subsequently defined by Pope Pius IX in 1854. St. Thomas made other statements to the same effect. The quote from Fr. Pesch above powerfully supports what we covered in the video. This is important to acknowledge because 1) it once again highlights the distinction between the teaching of theologians and the Magisterium; and 2) there are some “traditionalist” speakers and writers who to this day stubbornly insist that St. Thomas was not even wrong on the matter! They make this desperate claim because to admit that St. Thomas erred on this matter would destroy their incorrect understanding of what constitutes magisterial teaching. However, since they make this claim after the dogma was defined in 1854, their stubborn defense of a position that contradicts the dogma actually implicates them in heresy on the matter.
Liberation Theology In South America
I’m a Brazilian Catholic that turned into sedevacantist… Francis is an embarrassment to South America, he’s part of liberation theology. I studied my whole life in Catholic school and the only thing they teach them was liberation theology…
R
When I Stopped Attending The New Mass
Pope St. Zachary Against Altar Girls
When I stopped attending the new "mass" a few years ago, the parishioners in my town wanted to know the reasons. So I suggested to them as an exercise of charity that they study and read at least much of the content on the MHFM website. Since then I have been branded as a person who has lost the light of reason in religious matters, even a Carmelite nun suggested to me that I could be possessed by the devil. But as the Gospel of today's Mass admonishes us: "Beati eritis cum vos oderint homines, et cum separaverint vos, et exprobraverint, et ejicerint nomen vestrum tamquam malum propter Filium hominis." (Lc. 6:22) [“Blessed shall you be when men shall hate you, and when they shall separate you, and shall reproach you, and cast out your name as evil, for the Son of man's sake.” – Luke 6:22]
OreFerValle
Opened My Eyes To The Catholic Church
I was raised secular but began praying when I was in my late teen years about 10 years ago. I bought a bible and eventually found myself in a baptist church in Vancouver Canada where I currently reside. Your videos and other research has opened my eyes in regards to the Catholic Church being the one true church that Jesus established… I have begun learning to pray the rosary…
Thank you,
Ben
The liberal ‘mayor’ of NYC, Eric Adams, has been charged with fraud and bribery by the Feds not long after he complained about the migrant crisis in NYC. We don’t think that’s just a coincidence. Even though he’s very liberal and he’s in harmony with the conspiratorial agenda in various ways, they couldn’t tolerate his complaints about the migrant invasion. His statements were a huge embarrassment to them and served to expose their nefarious agenda. Thus, he got charged. Even if he’s guilty of certain things, we don’t think he would have been charged and pursued in this way if he had not made statements on that topic. It’s another example of the corruption of the federal agencies.
On Heretics Being Baptized
The Catholic Church – Trent Horn Misleads Calvinist “Redeemed Zoomer”
Please clarify: near the end of the video the Vatican II statement that those who are baptized are justified is criticized as wrong and heretical, but in another video on the Protestant idea of justification, you said we are justified in baptism. Is the difference only their status in a Protestant sect? I don’t understand.
Kimber
People are justified in baptism when they don't place an obstacle in the way. Heretics who are validly baptized are not justified (and they don't become members of the Church, even though the baptism is valid) because their heresy is an impediment to the reception of grace and union with Christ. Vatican II falsely teaches that all baptized heretics are incorporated into the Body of Christ and are justified in baptism, which contradicts Catholic teaching. For more on this particular issue and the Catholic teaching that Vatican II contradicts, see this video/article:
https://endtimes.video/trent-horn-refuted-on-catholic-church/
Many years ago we cited Pope Benedict XIV and Pope St. Gelasius condemning the practice of altar girls. After we promoted those references in our material, the passages became widely circulated and they were quoted by other people and groups on the internet.
Pope Benedict XIV: “Pope Gelasius in his ninth letter (Chap. 26) to the bishops of Lucania condemned the evil practice which had been introduced of women serving the priest at the celebration of Mass. Since this abuse had spread to the Greeks, Innocent IV strictly forbade it in his letter to the bishop of Tusculum: ‘Women should not dare to serve at the altar; they should be altogether refused this ministry.’ We too have forbidden this practice in the same words in Our oft-repeated constitution Etsi Pastoralis, sect. 6, no. 21.” (Allatae Sunt #29, July 26, 1755)
This is a new citation on the matter from Pope St. Zachary in 747. Note that he condemns the priests who allowed this abuse.
Pope St. Zachary, To Pippin (With Chapters), (Codex Epistolaris Carolinus 5), Jan. 5, 747, Chap. 5: [Against The Practice Of Altar Girls] “Chapter 26 in the book of blessed Pope Gelasius’ decrees concludes on these [questions]: that ‘it is wrong for women to minister at the holy altar or to presume to do anything of what are reckoned to be the duties of men. Nonetheless we have heard (to our annoyance) that such great contempt for divine matters has arisen that women are being encouraged to minister at sacred altars and their sex, as unsuitable as it is, to perform all those things allotted to the service of men. However the whole guilt and blasphemy for each one of the pernicious crimes we have proscribed falls upon the priests, who either commit them, or, in failing to expose those committing them, indicate that they favor wicked excesses.’”
Ukrainian Convinced Of The Faith
Name: Stepan
Country: Ukraine, rn in Romania (Bucharest).
Faith: I was baptized as an infant in Orthodox Church (The Ukrainian Orthodox Church of the Moscow Patriarchate), but whole my life was an agnostic, only in 2023 was how it called "born again" mostly by protestant preachers like Paul Washer, etc. Around that time I found your channel on youtube, was convinced that Catholic Church is the true church by facts you provided there. But, I needed more time to study and to make a final decision, because I had a protestant mindset about icons, Saint Mary, etc. Glory to God, He led me out of that mindset by providing information and explanations (your videos also) of why Church practices aren't "idolatry" as I wrongly thought. Thanks to God and to you…
Faith Restored
Francis Denies Christianity! – Endorses “All Religions”
Thank you for restoring my faith in the Catholic Church.
Jonathan DaSilva
Bergoglio Disqualified
Francis Denies Christianity! – Endorses “All Religions”
John 14:6 - Galatians 1:8 Bergolio is disqualified
Comment
Francis Denies Christianity! – Endorses “All Religions”
… Thank you… for another excellent video. God bless you.
Zather
They Shall Wonder
Francis Denies Christianity! – Endorses “All Religions”
They shall wonder great wonder.
Dlg
Every Martyr
Francis Denies Christianity! – Endorses “All Religions”
It was disrespectful to every martyr who died in Christ.
Rodrigo
They Are Evil
MHFM: Those people who see Antipope Francis’ acts of heresy and/or apostasy and still present him as ‘based’ or ‘conservative’ on those occasions when he says something true are evil. They present darkness as light.
Isaiah 5:20 “Woe to those who call evil good and good evil, who put darkness for light and light for darkness, who put bitter for sweet and sweet for bitter!”
Francis “Blesses” All Religions In Indonesia – Apostasy
Citing 2 John in this context is like protestants citing Mt 23, 1-13 on the account of catholics calling priests "father".
Francisco
You really don’t know what you are talking about. 2 John 1:10 was cited by Pope Pius XI in Mortalium Animos #9 to demonstrate that false ecumenism and participation in non-Catholic worship are against the divine law.
2 John 1:10-11- “If anyone comes to you and does not bring this doctrine, do not receive him into the house or give him any greeting; for whoever greets him takes part in his wicked works.”
Pope Pius XI, Mortalium Animos (# 9-10), Jan. 6, 1928: “Everyone knows that John himself, the Apostle of love, who seems to reveal in his Gospel the secrets of the Sacred Heart of Jesus, and who never ceased to impress on the memories of his followers the new commandment ‘Love one another,’ altogether forbade any intercourse with those who professed a mutilated and corrupt version of Christ's teaching: ‘If any man come to you and bring not this doctrine, receive him not into the house nor say to him: God speed you’ [2 John 1:10]… So, Venerable Brethren, it is clear why this Apostolic See has never allowed its subjects to take part in the meetings of non-Catholics…”
Thus, not only is 2 John relevant to the matter of the Church’s teaching against participation in non-Catholic worship, it’s one of the key texts cited by the Church on this matter. The Church’s teaching about this passage proves that Vatican II’s teaching on this matter is heretical (i.e. it denies a truth that has been authoritatively taught by the Church as divinely revealed). For more on this matter, see this video: https://endtimes.video/vatican-ii-new-religion/
MHFM: This quote from Pope Leo XII is just one of many powerful statements from popes that condemn the religious indifferentism of Antipope Francis.
Pope Leo XII, Ubi Primum (# 14), May 5, 1824: “It is impossible for the most true God, who is Truth itself, the best, the wisest Provider, and the Rewarder of good men, to approve all sects which profess false teachings which are often inconsistent with one another and contradictory, and to confer eternal rewards on their members... by divine faith we hold one Lord, one faith, one baptism, and that no other name under heaven is given to men except the name of Jesus Christ of Nazareth in which we must be saved. This is why we profess that there is no salvation outside the Church.”
On Rabbi Shmuley and The Talmud
Candace Owens vs Rabbi Shmuley - video
… The Pharisees were a Sect that opposed Christ and His teachings - and His one, universal Church. But since the Sanhedrin no longer exists, the Jews look upon the Talmud as their 'authority'; it is a collection of writings and opinions of Jewish Rabbis. Thus, Pharisaism became Talmudism.
When Candace Owens conveys the idea that Rabbi Shmuley and his associates are just a radical group living on the fringe of Judaism, she is mistaken. It is true that some Jews might not approve of Shmuley or might be embarrassed by him. But the truth is, what Shmuley represents -- in his attitudes, words and actions - is what the Talmud teaches. It does teach (among many things) that Jews are superior to non-Jews, and that Jews may lie to non-Jews. (So much for the 10 Commandments.) That's why Shmuley was not the least bit fazed or embarrassed each time evidence was presented that showed he had lied about Owens. On the contrary, when he was caught in one lie, he just doubled down and told more lies! As the Gospels tell us, the Pharisees hated Jesus Christ and the doctrines He taught. Just as they and all heretics do today.
Candace Owens (and everyone) should stop and consider why -- after some 2,000 years -- the political state of "Israel" was established at virtually the same time the predicted Counterfeit Vatican II Sect was established in Rome. Coincidence? They should also be asking why - after some 2,000 years - this Counterfeit Vatican 2 Sect reversed almost all of the teachings of the true Catholic Church. When people reject the true Catholic faith, they miss the lessons of the Bible, and they do not properly understand prophecy. I hope and pray that Owens is the truth-seeker she seems to be, and will find and follow MHFM and embrace the true Catholic faith. I also hope that many Jews - perhaps feeling embarrassed by the likes of Shmuley or disturbed by what's happening in the political state of Israel in these last days - will do likewise. If they are honest with themselves, they will recognize that every Old Testament prophecy about the Messiah was fulfilled in our Lord and Savior Jesus Christ.
Lee Ann
Died Of Drug Overdose
The Most Misunderstood Catholic Decree – Council Of Trent, Sess. 6, Chap. 4
Hello, Brothers. This video was excellent, as always, thank you. I have recently heard of an old former friend of mine that passed away. They had overdosed on a drug. This was a lifelong problem for them. Finding this out about them caused our friendship to drift apart. However, upon hearing this news, my heart is saddened. Is it okay to pray for them and to ask for God's mercy regarding their life and death? I've searched around for a clear answer, but I can't seem to find anyone I can trust. Can you give me the correct answer regarding true Catholic theology? Thank you, brothers. God bless you all.
Jack G
What you describe is sad. However, a Catholic is not permitted to pray for the person you described because he died in a clear state of grave sin. Catholics are not permitted to pray for those who die outside the Church or in a state of grave sin. For Catholic teaching on that matter, see this: https://endtimes.video/five-popes-gregory/
Francis’ False Consecration Of Russia
Major Escalation Towards WWIII - NATO & the U.S. to join in attack on Russia - video
More striking proof to those who still believe that Francis is the pope, that his supposed "consecration" of Russia has been, and is, "absolutely null and utterly void", just like & due to his fake "ordination" and his false claim to the papacy. His "consecration" formula is followed by the words, "Grant that war may end and peace spread throughout the world". Well, nothing could be further from the truth! Indeed, by now, this conflict in poor Ukraine has lasted 2.5 years. Bearing in mind the abominable religious indifferentism that Francis & the Vatican II Sect have so clearly shown lately, as well as their manifest support for same-sex activities, one could argue that his "consecration" has actually turned to a curse, like what St. Gregory VII said about the blessings of those disobedient priests engaged in fornication. The curse is that the war did not stop, but rather, it's escalated.
Najmat
Video Posted
The Most Misunderstood Catholic Decree – Council Of Trent, Sess. 6, Chap. 4
MHFM: This new video covers an extremely important matter with new points. It contains crucial information that’s relevant to understanding the faith and the Magisterium.
Comment
The Most Misunderstood Catholic Decree – Council Of Trent, Sess. 6, Chap. 4
Awesome video…
K S
To Know The Truth
Thank you so very much for helping me to know the truth. I knew something wasn't right and you connected the dots for me. Thank you again.
Brian Blackburn
Teaching The Faith
Many thanks for all the great work you do in teaching the true Catholic Faith.
Jens Vanboterdael
Logical Coherence
The Most Misunderstood Catholic Decree – Council Of Trent, Sess. 6, Chap. 4
Thank you for this great new video, where logical coherence is combined with the substance of the spiritual content of salvation.
Tommaso
Water-Tight
The Most Misunderstood Catholic Decree – Council Of Trent, Sess. 6, Chap. 4
Water-tight… Thank you, Brothers, for this critical alarm. Let all who call themselves "Catholic" shake themselves free from the deceiver and follow the voice of the True Shepherd -- After searching it out you will find it in the immemorial Magisterium.
J Balderston
Comment
The Most Misunderstood Catholic Decree – Council Of Trent, Sess. 6, Chap. 4
Another excellent video!
Christoffer
Decree
The Most Misunderstood Catholic Decree – Council Of Trent, Sess. 6, Chap. 4
Very detailed and analytical.
Emmanuel
Unusquisque – Every Single One Needs Baptism
We have a video and an article that shows how the oldest surviving papal decree (AD 385 of Pope St. Siricius) directly contradicts the idea of “baptism of desire”.
The Latin Text of the Oldest Surviving Papal Decree Rejects “Baptism of Desire” - Pope St. Siricius
Pope St. Siricius, Decree to Himerius, A.D. 385: “Therefore just as we say that the holy paschal observance is in no way to be diminished, we also say that to infants who will not yet be able to speak on account of their age or to those who in any necessity will need the holy stream of baptism, we wish succor to be brought with all celerity, lest it should tend to the perdition of our souls if the saving font be denied to those desiring it and every single one of them (unusquisque) exiting this world lose both the Kingdom and life.
Whoever should fall into the peril of shipwreck, the incursion of an enemy, the uncertainty of a siege or the desperation of any bodily sickness, and should beg to be relieved by the unique help of faith, let them obtain the rewards of the much sought-after regeneration in the same moment of time in which they beg for it. Let the previous error in this matter be enough; [but] now let all priests maintain the aforesaid rule, who do not want to be torn from the solidity of the apostolic rock upon which Christ constructed His universal Church.”
It’s interesting to note that Siricius uses the word “unusquisque”, which means “every single one”. This indicates that there are no exceptions in this matter. The Latin word “quisque” means “each one”. “Unusquisque” is a strengthened form of the word meaning “every single one”. Siricius’ use of this word (in this context) shows that he did not believe in “baptism of desire”. If Siricius thought that some unbaptized catechumens could be saved without baptism, he would have mentioned the idea of “baptism of desire” or expressed that only some of them might be lost. Instead, he uses a word meaning “every single one” (unusquisque) to indicate that the denial of baptism would result in the loss of salvation for every single person who desired baptism. Not only do many John 3:5 mockers reject or ignore this powerful evidence, but some of them even have the audacity to claim that Siricius’ passage teaches “baptism of desire” when the opposite is true! They are extremely dishonest.
Teaching Of True Popes
Francis “Blesses” All Religions In Indonesia – Apostasy
Thank you for passing on to us the faithful teaching of true popes, the solid rock of Peter, upon which we can stand firm against the growing demonic storm and furious waves of iniquity and rebellion. I would never know of these popes and true doctrine if it weren't for all your well presented, faithful videos. The pictures and written gobbets of crucial information also really help to follow and focus.
Carrie P
Video Posted
Francis “Blesses” All Religions In Indonesia - Apostasy
Overwhelming Evidence
Francis “Blesses” All Religions In Indonesia – Apostasy
God is providing people with an almost limitless amount of evidence concerning the present apostasy. Let no one ever say that God is spreading confusion, for the conclusion that one must reach on this issue is crystal clear. Francis is not Catholic. The Vatican II sect is not Catholic. Thank you for the video.
J. Knight
Truth
Francis “Blesses” All Religions In Indonesia – Apostasy
Great video, THE TRUTH!!
Robert Pina
Assistance
Francis “Blesses” All Religions In Indonesia – Apostasy
Great job! Thank you for your assistance.
Santiago F
Has Come To Accept Traditional Catholicism
Dear MHFM,
My name is Cian, I live in Oklahoma and I’ve been recently watching and reading your material. I have come to accept traditional Catholicism and I distain the Novus Ordo… Thank you most holy family monastery for showing me the truth about the true faith.
Sincerely,
C.W.
Gregory The Great: Bad Pastors Kill Souls
Pope St. Gregory the Great, Book 1, Letter 34: “… when the pastor refuses to rebuke those that sin, there is no doubt that in holding his peace he slays them.”
Benedict XVI’s Heresies “Off The Charts”
Whaaat? Off the charts. WHY are JP2, Benedict and Bergoglio so intent on snuggling up to these non-Catholic "religions"? And active participants in their rituals? Looks like we've had quite a line of anti-popes for decades...
Karen Tarnell
Trinity
This is absolutely amazing. Gold.
The J Catholic
Thankful Catholic
Dear MHFM,
My name is James, and I’ve been a long time viewer of your material. When I first came across your YouTube channel and website over a decade ago, I thought it was ridiculous and demonic. This false conclusion on my end was due to ignorance of Catholic doctrine/teaching. In an effort to see why the sedevacantist position is wrong I began to study.
I first read all 16 documents of V2. After reading them I knew something was clearly wrong with these documents. How could Christ’s Church esteem false religions “dogmatically”, among many other errors. I then read the doctrines from previous councils, most notably the council of Florence, along with the teachings of the Fathers, Sacred Scripture, the popes and saints. The blatant contradiction was as clear as night and day. I then, of course, had to conclude that the sedevacantist position was correct.
Based on several years of watching your videos, praying, and studying, there has been no doubt in my mind on the correctness of your work. The 3 books that I’ve purchased from your store (outside the Catholic Church there is absolutely no salvation, what really happened after Vatican 2, the Bible proves the papacy) have been an amazing wealth of information and sources to prove sedevacantism and the truth of Catholicism.
Thank you for your work.
Fraternally,
James
Would Be In Shock & Dismay
“New Amazon rite of the Mass to enter 3-year ‘experimental phase’”
To make things even more deplorable, whenever a protestant heretic calls out a novusordite by accusing his religion of being filled with paganistic idolatry, the protestant will be right.
The Vatican 2 Cult is anything. Any religion, BUT Catholic. When it comes to liturgical madness, North Americans and Europeans do look tame when contrasted with all the crazy and wild things that happen in South America. Francis is really letting a dragon loose. I'm so glad that I was able to find your material in the mid 2000s. Otherwise I would now be in total shock and dismay.
Rgck
In 1076 almost all the bishops of Italy had departed from fidelity to the Apostolic See during the controversy between Pope St. Gregory VII and King Henry IV.
Pope St. Gregory VII, To All The Faithful In Germany (Wandering Epistles #14), Summer 1076: “… not only would he [King Henry IV] not be recalled to repentance from the misdeeds which he had committed, but he was seized by a still greater fury of mind. He did not pause until he had made shipwreck regarding the faith of Christ of almost all the Italian bishops and of as many in Germany as he could, compelling them to contradict their due obedience to St. Peter and the Apostolic See…”
This is a good quote from Pope St. Gregory the Great that contradicts Vatican II’s heretical teaching on religious liberty. Pope St. Gregory instructs the Exarch of Africa to suppress the Donatists because they corrupt people with their heresy.
Pope St. Gregory the Great, Book 1, Letter 74, To Gennadius, Patrician and Exarch of Africa: “For it is known that men heretical in religion, if they have liberty allowed them to do harm (which God forbid), rise strenuously against the Catholic faith, to the end that they may transfuse, if they can, the poison of their heresy to the corrupting of the members of the Christian body. For we have learned that they are lifting up their necks against the Catholic Church, the Lord being opposed to them, and desire to pervert the faith of the Christian profession. But let your Eminence suppress their attempts, and subdue their proud necks to the yoke of rectitude… we beseech the Lord to make your arm strong for subduing your enemies, and to sharpen your soul with zeal for the faith like the edge of a quivering sword.”
St. Robert Bellarmine also makes reference to this letter of Gregory the Great.
St. Robert Bellarmine, De Laicis, Chap. 21: “In Book 1, Epistle 72 [it’s actually 74], to Gennadius Exarch of Africa, St. Gregory praises him because with great zeal he was persecuting heretics with arms, and he exhorts him to continue.”
Not The Same God
This is what the Muslims did when they sacked Constantinople in 1453. Muslims know that Christians and Muslims don’t worship the same God. (They worship a false god, while Christians worship the true God.)
Warren H. Carroll, The Glory of Christendom, p. 568: “They tore down the great crucifix and carried it through the streets with a janissary’s cap on its thorn-pieced head, saying: ‘Behold the God of the Christians!’ Sultan Muhammad II, entering the city, rode directly to Hagia Sophia and proclaimed it a mosque. The sack of Constantinople went on for the three days he had promised to his men. Four thousand Christians were killed. More than 50,000 others, virtually the entire surviving population, were seized, and all but the few who could pay large ransoms were enslaved.”
Also, in Catholic documents Muslims are frequently called “pagans” .
Photians
“Orthodoxy” Devastated, Catholicism Vindicated, By The 7th Council (Nicaea II)
Anathema to the Photians. Brilliant video.
Justin
I Was Thinking Of Going To An "Orthodox" Church
“Orthodoxy” Devastated, Catholicism Vindicated, By The 7th Council (Nicaea II)
I'd been thinking about going to an Antiochian "orthodox" church and starting my catechism, but this video has changed my mind. There's a Catholic church not even a 10 minute walk from my apartment, and this Sunday, I will attend my first Mass. For anyone reading this, please pray for me. Thank you for educating me on the heresies of the East, and may God have mercy on us all.
Hoosiermensch
We're glad that you viewed the video, and that you see that Eastern 'Orthodoxy' is false. This playlist contains more proof for Catholicism and additional refutations of Eastern 'Orthodoxy': https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLGVSKByrYzss4weDvPDa-2SANNmPrxaqD
However, you cannot just go to any 'Mass' that purports to be Catholic. As our material explains, the Vatican II Sect under Francis is actually not the Catholic Church. We can help you with how to embrace the traditional Catholic faith. These videos (among others) explain why the Vatican II Sect is not the Catholic Church.
https://endtimes.video/apocalypse-now-in-the-vatican/
https://endtimes.video/bible-predict-no-pope/
https://endtimes.video/vatican-ii-new-religion/
https://endtimes.video/sedevacantism-francis-pope-celestine/
https://endtimes.video/catholic-charismatic-movement-exposed/
We also recommend that Catholics, if they can, pray 15 decades of the Rosary each day and the Hail Mary frequently. This is an important spiritual video: https://endtimes.video/how-to-avoid-sin/ These are also important videos for a foundational understanding of the Church's necessity for salvation: https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLGVSKByrYzssJHrA8L1PjrxWW-S15pnEQ
In his work Against Jovinianus (Book 2), St. Jerome identifies Rome as the great harlot (Babylon the Great) whose name was written on her forehead. Note that he refers to the city of Rome (not the Catholic Church) as the great harlot.
St. Jerome, Against Jovinianus, Book 2: “But I will now address myself to you, great Rome, who with the confession of Christ have blotted out the blasphemy written on your forehead [Apoc. 17:5]. Mighty city, mistress-city of the world, city of the Apostle's praises, show the meaning of your name... let virtue lift you up on high, let not voluptuousness bring you low. By repentance, as the history of Nineveh proves, you may escape the curse wherewith the Savior threatened you in the Apocalypse.”
Pagan Rome was replaced by Christian Rome, but returns in the last days during the Great Apostasy (which we are living through).
Apocalypse 17:5- “And on her forehead was written a name of mystery: ‘Babylon the great, mother of harlots and of earth’s abominations.’”
Pope St. Gregory the Great, Book 1, Letter 25: “For often vices show themselves off as virtues, so that stinginess would fain appear as frugality, extravagance as liberality, cruelty as righteous zeal, laxity as loving-kindness.”
Pope St. Gregory the Great says that God killed the Lombard King Autharit for opposing the Catholic faith.
Pope St. Gregory the Great, Book 1, Letter 17: “Inasmuch as the abominable [Lombard King] Autharit during this Easter solemnity which has been lately completed, forbade children of Lombards being baptized in the Catholic faith, for which sin the Divine Majesty cut him off, so that he should not see the solemnity of another Easter, it becomes your Fraternity to warn all the Lombards in your districts, seeing that grievous mortality is everywhere imminent, that they should reconcile these their children who have been baptized in Arian heresy to the Catholic faith, and so appease the wrath of the Almighty Lord which hangs over them.”
Bellarmine: St. Francis & St. Benedict Were Not Priests
St. Robert Bellarmine, De Romano Pontifice, Book 1, Chap. 27: “St. Jerome and St. Thomas Aquinas were simple priests; Anthony [of the Desert], Benedict, and Francis were not even priests...”
The Radical Left Is From Hell
Dear Brothers,
It's difficult to understand how people cannot see a difference between Trump and the radical left. The conglomerate of the radical left is like seepage from Hell. It is chilling, in fact, to see how, with all the different backgrounds of individuals who compose 'the left' - they all seem to have the same demonic mindset. People who do the things they do used to be called 'the criminally insane'. Back then, the Left of the day tried to excuse such criminals by claiming that the reason they committed their crimes was because they were insane. (Of course, it's the other way around.) But I never seem to hear that phrase (criminally insane) any more. I guess it's redundant, now that there's the radical left. Nobody would be able to see the difference.
The Radical Left hates God. They hate Jesus Christ. They hate the Blessed Virgin Mary. They hate truth. They hate humanity. They even hate one another. They hate law, and merit, and excellence. They devise every means to kill infants -- and to destroy the children they weren't able to kill. They foist pornography, homosexuality, drugs, and poisons on children and people of all ages. They imprison and enslave people. They lie, and lie, and lie - about everything. They attempt to destroy everything that is orderly, beautiful or meaningful. They steal anything and everything they can get their hands on. They hate individuals, families and nations.
It's simply disingenuous for anyone to say that there is no difference between Trump and the Radical Left.
Lee Ann
False Miracles Connected To John Paul II
“Fr.” James Altman Deceived By John Paul II’s False Mysticism
If JP11 was a heretic how come several miracles were attributed to his intercession and led to him being made a saint? I am genuinely trying to get my head around this...
Gemma
Francis is an antipope, and his ‘canonizations’ are invalid. With regard to the alleged ‘miracles’, those were some of the false signs and wonders mentioned in 2 Thess. 2 in connection to the life and veneration of the Antichrist, as our material explains. See these videos (among others):
https://endtimes.video/apocalypse-now-in-the-vatican/
https://endtimes.video/temple-of-god-vatican-prophecy-antichrist/
https://endtimes.video/antichrist-distinguishing-mark/
https://endtimes.video/the-antichrist-conquers-in-this-sign/
John Paul II’s life, wounding, false canonization, etc. directly fulfill prophecy about the Antichrist, the veneration of the image of the Beast, and the return of pagan Rome. The many false apparitions that occurred during his reign (e.g. Medjugorje), which portrayed him as ‘Mary’s pope’ (an absurd lie), were also connected to the prophesied false signs and wonders. This video/article covers another revealing heresy of John Paul II: https://vaticancatholic.com/john-paul-ii-redemptor-hominis/
Clear Answer
Is Mary The “Co-Redemptrix”? – A Catholic Analysis
I’m thankful for this clear answer on this topic. Jesus my Lord and Redeemer.
M Harty
A Twisted View Of Liberty
The Radical Left has a very twisted view of “Liberty”… Liberty was given to us so that we could freely know, love, and serve God. Doing evil is not liberty but an abuse of it because sin is the most vile form of slavery. True Liberty is the freedom to live virtuously and not licentiously.
S Hernandez
When He Tried To Burn An Image Of John Paul II
“Fr.” James Altman Deceived By John Paul II’s False Mysticism
When I accepted the sedevacantist position by watching your videos against the antipopes I decided to burn pictures that I had of Benedict XVI and of John Paul II. The picture that I had of Benedict XVI burned as any piece of paper would but when I tried to burn the picture of John Paul II it did not burn. I threw alcohol on it and put it on fire but the fire burned the alcohol and did not burn the picture.
I then got on my knees and prayed to God and watched your video on the heresies of John Paul II again and said to God that it is impossible for this man to be a true pope and that I rejected this man. Then tried to burn the picture again and it burned as any other piece of paper would. It is impossible that these antipopes are true popes. I think God was putting my faith to the test to see if I believed more in miracles than in His holy revelation, that is the Holy Roman Catholic Faith of all the centuries. Thank you very much for your videos and works on the true Catholic Faith.
Diogo
False Opposition
“Fr.” James Altman Deceived By John Paul II’s False Mysticism
I’d have thought that his repudiation of Francis would have opened his eyes to the full truth but some people just remain pertinaciously obstinate in their bad will.
Deus Vult
It's another example of how the Devil is raising up many people to serve as false opposition, so that people think they've found the true answer to the current crisis/apostasy when they have not. Many other false traditionalists (e.g. Taylor Marshall) fall into the same category.
Video Posted
“Fr.” James Altman Deceived By John Paul II’s False Mysticism
Facts
“Fr.” James Altman Deceived By John Paul II’s False Mysticism
Thank you for bringing to our attention all these facts that we were not aware of and presenting all your well documented arguments.
Dominguez
Comment
“Fr.” James Altman Deceived By John Paul II’s False Mysticism
Another important video by MHFM. Pray that Altman converts to the traditional Catholic faith.
Eagle
No Lack
“Fr.” James Altman Deceived By John Paul II’s False Mysticism
I'm hugely grateful for your videos and watch them daily, but I'm discovering that sharing the sedevacantist conclusion with friends and family is a lonely position to hold. Kind of like the cross...which the daily 15-decade rosary helps to sweeten.
Dr. Parakletos
We're glad you like the material. People need to continue to evangelize, even though there is a lot of bad will today.
St. Basil, De Spiritu Sancto: “There is no lack in these days of captious listeners and questioners; but to find a character desirous of information, and seeking the truth as a remedy for ignorance, is very difficult.”
Method
“Fr.” James Altman Deceived By John Paul II’s False Mysticism
Thank you… You make many good points but one I think stands out is how Satan allows for some truth in the message as a method to gain acceptance.
Sonny Jim
^
" />
" />
" />
" />
" />
